Legal Opinion

Williams v. Polgar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1974No. 14 May Term 1973, Docket No. 54,422Published

1Opinion of the Court

391 Mich. 6 (1974)

214 N.W.2d 149

WILLIAMS

v.

POLGAR

No. 14 May Term 1973, Docket No. 54,422.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 14, 1974.

Perica, Breithart & Carmody, for plaintiffs.

Rowe, Talon & Jones, P.C., for defendant American Title Insurance Company.

WILLIAMS, J.

While important, the issue in this case is a relatively narrow one.

Michigan already permits a buyer of property who has relied on a faulty abstract to his detriment to recover from the abstracter, even though there is no clear contractual privity between them, if the abstracter in fact knew the buyer would rely on the…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API