Legal Opinion

Zaidi v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 17, 2002No. 01-00-01066-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellant, Maryam Jamilah Zaidi, challenges a default judgment rendered against her for professional misconduct. The trial court, the Honorable Sam Katz presiding, found appellant violated Texas Rule of Disciplinary Procedure 4.02(a) by communicating directly with a represented client, and imposed a six-year suspension, with the first year active and the remaining years probated. In seven issues, appellant challenges the trial setting and the default judgment. We affirm.

Facts

Appellant filed a federal lawsuit against Texas Universal Insurance (“Texas Universal”), and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Curtis v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Arce v. Burrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Ohio Medical Products, Inc. v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. Green Investment Group, LLC v. Martin ElzeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API