Legal Opinion

State v. Grey Owl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1982No. 13338PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*802HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

Melvin Grey Owl (appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction, based on a jury verdict, of attempted rape and attempted incest. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case is before us for the second time. In State v. Grey Owl, 295 N.W.2d 748 (S.D.1980) (hereinafter referred to as Grey Owl I) we reversed appellant’s conviction of attempted rape and attempted incest because the trial court failed to instruct the jury with respect to the impeachment of the victim’s testimony by a prior inconsistent statement.

Appellant was subsequently retried on the same charges. Again,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RhinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MichalekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. McCaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API