Legal Opinion

State v. Sinclair

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

The .defendant was found guilty of manslaughter by abortion by the trial court sitting without a jury. He contends that there was no evidence to support the trial court’s findings that he was capable of assisting in his own defense and that he was sane as judged by the M’Naghten rule.

This is another case in which the conduct of the defendant was a product of mental illness, in this case schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type. See State v. Van Kleeck, 248 Or 7, 432 P2d 175 (1967). Nevertheless, there was evidence to support the trial court’s findings. Contrary to the defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Van KleeckOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jack E. Sinclair v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. LemeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API