Legal Opinion

Frank Reilly v. U.S. Bank National Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 2016No. 4D14-867Published

1Per curiam

Appellant Frank Reilly appeals a final judgment of foreclosure, arguing that the trial court, erred by proceeding to. trial where the case was not yet at issue. 1 We .agree and reverse.

Mr. Reilly and Mynabel Roche, "who were married at the time, executed a promissory note and a mortgage. 2 After they failed to make .payments, U.S. Bank brought a foreclosure action. U.S. Bank was able to personally serve Ms. Roche with the complaint. It was unable, however, to personally serve Mr. Reilly, and claimed that he was avoiding service. U.S. Bank therefore sought to proceed with notice by publication.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Ocean Bank v. Garcia-VillaltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Tucker v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. U.S. Bank National Association v. Keith CroteauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API