Legal Opinion

In re Kruppenbacher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

The decree of August 19, 1938, which allowed the trustees commissions and costs, has been reversed. (Matter of Ziegler, 256 App. Div. 305.) The decree of April 6, 1939, which, in conformity with our decision in Matter of Ziegler (supra) revoked and remitted the commissions and costs originally allowed, is controlling. The Surrogate was powerless to amend the portion of the latter decree withholding the commissions and costs. (Surr. Ct. Act, § 20, subd. 6; Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Permission of the Surrogate is unnecessary for issuance of execution. (Matter of Mason, 175 Misc. 458.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of MasonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of KruppenbacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API