Legal Opinion

Bill Hodges Truck Company v. Kaw Drilling Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1970No. 42479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This appeal involves efforts, by plaintiff in error, to collect, by means of garnishment proceedings, a confessed judgment it obtained on January 6, 1967, in the sum of $6,653.28, with interest and attorneys fees, in the trial court’s Cause No. 26830, styled: “Bill Hodges Truck Co., Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Blubaugh, Inc., Defendant”. At the pretrial held in that case, it was stipulated that the named defendant corporation had changed its name; and, accordingly, the journal entry of the judgment, entered therein, recited that said plaintiff’s recovery was decreed against “the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Boose v. HanlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Mortgage Bond Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. City of the Village v. McCownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Service Printing Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spears v. PrebleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Green v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. General Supply Co. v. Pinnacle Drilling Fluids, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Spears v. PrebleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API