Legal Opinion
Paige v. H. Price & Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 5, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appb-al from a Judgment vacating an Order of Arrest, made at Spring Term, 1877, of Cumberland Superior Court, by McKoy, J. The case is sufficiently stated by The Chief .Justice in delivering the opinion of this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
This is an, appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment vacating an order of arrest, previously made and discharging the bail bonds which had been given.
The order of arrest was based upon an affidavit of the plaintiff in these words:—
“M. Frank Paige j against I Hannah Price, Abraha'm Elson, - partners as H. Price & Co. William Price & Simon Brandt. _
1. M. Frank Paige being duly sworn, says that he is the plaintiff above named; that a sufficient cause of action exists in his favor against William Price, Hannah Price, Abraham Elson and Simon Brandt, the grounds of which appear by the sworn…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Benedict, Hall Co. v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peebles v. FooteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Young v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Cowles v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878