Legal Opinion

LaForge v. Normandin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although plaintiff and the moving defendants are all residents of Quebec, four codefendants are domiciliaries of New York, and one of the codefendants is a municipal corporation. We thus are presented with a matter involving domiciliaries of different jurisdictions with conflicting loss-distribution rules. In such cases, "the law of the place of the tort will normally apply, unless displacing it ' "will advance” the relevant substantive law purposes without impairing the smooth working of the multi-state system or producing great uncertainty for litigants’ ” (Schultz v Boy Scouts, 65 NY2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Gould Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. King v. Car Rentals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Bodea v. TransNat Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Burns v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API