Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Bishop

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; —heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was a bill in equity, brought by M. E. Lowe, trustee, and E. F. Bayley, successor, to foreclose a certain trust deed, executed by Caleb Goodwin and Elizabeth Goodwin, to secure seven promissory notes made payable to themselves and endorsed to Alexander Bishop,—one note for $5,000, due in three years after date, and six interest notes, for $175 each. The note of five thousand dollars was given for a loan of that amount of money loaned by Bishop to Goodwin, and the defense attempted to be set up in the answer was, that the transaction was usurious. The answer setting up usury, is as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors of Fulton County v. Mississippi & Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Mosier v. NortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Ammondson v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ballinger v. BourlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Stone v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Borrowers' & Investors' Building Ass'n v. EklundIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Matthews v. Georgia State Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. McKayIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Tillinghast v. ChaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API