Beeman & Cashin Mercantile Co. v. Sorenson
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Uinta County, Hon. David H. Craig, Judge. .The facts are stated in the opinion. With the judgment in the main suit and the overruling of the motion for new trial the case was terminated, and the court lost jurisdiction, and the liability for costs was settled. (3 Ency. D., 184; 5 Ency.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Uinta County, Hon. David H. Craig, Judge. .The facts are stated in the opinion. With the judgment in the main suit and the overruling of the motion for new trial the case was terminated, and the court lost jurisdiction, and the liability for costs was settled. (3 Ency. D., 184; 5 Ency. PI. & Pr., 109.) The first állowance of the sheriff’s expenses amounted to a judgment' against defendant, and the motion to vacate should have been made within ten days. (R. S. 1899, Sec. 3748; Ch. 66, Raws 1901.) Not having been made in that time, the motion did not carry the…
1Opinion of the Court
Potter, Chief Justice.
The Beeman & Cashin Mercantile Company brought an action in justice court against Henry Sorenson for the recovery of a money judgment, and secured the issuance of a writ' of attachment at the commencement of the suit. Subsequently an alias writ of .attachment was issued, under which the deputy sheriff attached certain mares as the property of the defendant. The trial before the justice of the peace resulted in a judgment for the defendant and an order discharging the attachment and releasing the attached property. An appeal was taken to the District Court, where a trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell & Lewis Co. v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Schneider v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Alexander v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ward v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- City Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.