Legal Opinion

Schuermann v. Twachtman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1916Published

Error.

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, O. B., J.

This cause was decided in the court below upon a general demurrer to the petition. Defendant there not desiring to further plead, on the overruling of this demurrer judgment was entered for plaintiffs.

*274The petition states that in each cause'of action money was borrowed by defendant’s intestate Christian F. Schuermann for his sole use and benefit, from the Mutual Life Insurance Company, under an agreement to repay same signed not only by himself but also by his children, W. H. Schuermann and Elizabeth Schuermann Twaehtman, neither of whom received any part of said consideration…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Life Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  2. Walsh v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Diehm v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Glenn v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Martin v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API