Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Berliner v. Pappalardo

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 22, 2012No. 11-1831Published

1Concurring in the judgmentLipez, Circuit Judge

I

The issue of fee-only Chapter 13 petitions has emerged in recent years largely as a result of two events. The first was the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamie v. U.S. Tr., 540 U.S. 526, 124 S.Ct. 1023, 157 L.Ed.2d 1024 (2004), which held that attorney’s fees are not payable from estate funds in a Chapter 7 proceeding except in limited circumstances. Id. at 538-39, 124 S.Ct. 1023 (construing 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(1)). Attorneys who advise debtors on Chapter 7 filings thus may be unable to collect their fees once the plans are in place, prompting them to request payment in full up front. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Sullivan v. Solimini (In Re Sullivan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Pasquina v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API