Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Cattle Co. v. Burns, Walker & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1891No. 6779PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge,

Section A.—There is no statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The case is brought up upon the conclusions of fact and law of the district judge, and they illustrate the points at issue. The findings are as follows: •

“1. That on the first day of March, A. D. 1883, I. E. Stevens, T. H. Hord, W. R. Nunn, and L. P. Glasscock entered into articles of in corporation, acting under title 20 of the Revised Statutes concerning private corporations, for the purposes as expressed therein of ‘buying, selling, raising, and breeding cattle, and the acquiring of all such lands,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Western Railway Co. v. GentryTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Andrews v. KeyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kortright v. Buffalo Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Case v. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Baker v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Yeaman v. Galveston City CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, PA v. Tandem Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. 1st Nat. Bk. v. So. Beaumont L. I.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Dooley v. Gladiator Consolidated Gold Mines & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API