Legal Opinion

Snider v. . Lackenour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This cause was transferred by consent of parties, at the Fall Term, 1842, of the Court of Equity, of Stokes couhty to the Supreme Court. The facts are stated in the' opinion delivered in this court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaston, J.

The plaintiff, Philip Snider, filed this bill in July 1841, against Philip Lackenour and Samuel and Eliz ..abeth the wife of said Samuel, defendants. In it he charges, that in 1814 he intermarried with Salome, the daughter of George Lackenour, by whom he had several children ; that in the year 1832, ihe said George, intending to- divide his estate among his-children, conveyed to the plaintiff, by a deed of gift duly-executed and registered, a female slave named Betty and her child David; that shortly thereafter the plaintiff’s wife died, and the said George, repenting of the bounty which he…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Tarlton v. Griggs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. In Re CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  5. Higdon v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API