Legal Opinion

Camoscio v. Board of Registration

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff (hereafter, appellant) seeks judicial review of a decision of the Board of Registration in Podiatry (board), adopting the recommended decision of a hearing officer that the appellant had engaged in malpractice, concluding that as a matter of law the appellant was guilty of “deceit, malpractice and gross misconduct in the practice of his profession," and revoking his license to practice podiatry. A single justice of this court transferred the action to this court without decision.

1. The appellant asserts that because there was no probable cause to investigate his actions, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. School Committee v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. New England Medical Center, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camoscio v. Board of Registration in PodiatryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Camoscio v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API