Legal Opinion

Codner v. Siegel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1980No. 36155PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bowles, Justice.

This court granted certiorari to consider Division 2 of the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Siegel v. Codner, 153 Ga. App. 438 (265 SE2d 287) (1980) which suggests that partial performance is sufficient consideration for an accord and satisfaction where a lesser amount than owed is offered to satisfy a liquidated debt.

The facts are set forth in that opinion.

The issue before the court is whether partial performance serves as consideration for an agreement to take a lesser sum than the amount owed on a liquidated debt. Siegel contends that on June 8, Codner orally agreed to accept…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgamy v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Taylor v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Zellner v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Blalock v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Siegel v. CodnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. Winder Laboratories, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  2. Computer Maintenance Corp. v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Dixie Groceries, Inc. v. Albany Business MacHines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Thomas v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Carter v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API