Legal Opinion

Tierney v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Harris. The ease was tried before Hon. James Love, judge of the criminal court of Harris and Galveston counties. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the chief justice.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, C. J.

— On the 11th November, 1866, the following document was executed:

“ The State of Texas, 1 Harris County. J

■ “Know all men by these presents: That we,-, as principal, and we,-, as sureties, are bound and firmly held in the just and full sum of $5,000 to the State of Texas. Given under our hands this 11th day of Hovember, 1866. The considerations of the above bond are, that Daniel Tierney shall be and appear at the next regular term of the criminal court for Harris county. How, if the said Tierney shall appear before the court from day to day until the case is disposed of, this bond and all…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Michael Kleinman v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API