Legal Opinion

Camden v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 5, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Moorman

Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment convicting Alex Camden of manufacturing intoxicating liquor in violation of the prohibition law. Two errors are assigned for a reversal of the judgment: First, the admission of incompetent testimony; and, second, the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence.

The testimony complained of consists of statements made by the arresting officer to the effect that when he approached the illicit still appellant drew a pistol from his pocket. Counsel argue that this testimony was incompetent and highly prejudicial in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sorrels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Spicer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Roberts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Egnor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API