Legal Opinion

City Loan Co. v. Cheney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1895No. Nos. 9143—(26)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action to recover possession of personal property under a chattel mortgage executed by the defendants. The defense interposed was that the debt secured by the mortgage was usurious. It appears that, when the defendant William Cheney applied to the plaintiff for a loan of $500, he was required, as a *84condition of obtaining the loan, to buy 13 shares of plaintiff’s “common stock,” at $2 per share, and that thereupon it loaned him $500, and no more, and took his note for $526, drawing interest at 10 per cent, per annum. The only important question in the case is whether this professed sale of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. Foshay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Zenith Building & Loan Ass'n v. HeimbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Freed-Goodall Furniture Co. v. Morris Plan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API