Heart of Live Oak, Inc. v. State, Office of Financial Regulation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the Final Order of the Office of Financial Regulation in all respects. We highlight Appellant’s Points I and II only, to hold that Appellant did not preserve those issues for appellate review. “It is well-established that for an issue to be preserved for appeal, it must be raised in the administrative proceeding of the alleged error.” Dep’t of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation, Constr. Indus. Licensing Bd. v. Harden, 10 So.3d 647, 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citing Yachting Arcade, Inc. v. Riverwalk Condo. Assoc., Inc., 500 So.2d 202, 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)). “[A] party cannot argue on appeal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Department of Business & Professional Regulation v. HardenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Pullen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Yachting Arcade v. RIVERWALK CONDO. ASSOC. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Palm Construction Company of West Florida v. Department of Financial Services, Division etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Gabrielle Goodwin v. Florida Department of Children etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016