Legal Opinion

J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Mims

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1929No. 12707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

On December 16, 1924, under the terms of a contract of sale entered into between the parties, the plaintiff sold to the defendant B. E. Mims, trading as B. E. Mims Eumber ■Company, a planing and matching machine, to be kept and used by him at his place of business at Allendale, S. C. The purchase price to be paid, as provided by the contract, was $6,470, it being agreed that the plaintiffs should receive in part payment, at the fixed value of $2,500, the planing and matching machine then owned by the defendant. The machine sold by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. Bruce v. MoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arkwright Mills v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. John D. Hollingsworth on Wheels, Inc. v. Arkon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Georgetows Towing Co. v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API