Legal Opinion

People v. Homer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated, motion denied, count one of indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Oswego County Court for further proceedings on indictment. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of burglary in the third degree, defendant contends *935that reversal is required because his factual recitation negated an essential element of the crime, i.e., entry into the building. We agree.

Where, as here, defendant’s factual recitation negates an essential element of the crime, the court was under a duty to make further inquiry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. LewocAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. BendrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API