Joy v. Winder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Joy and Nelson have appealed from a judgment for personal injuries recovered against them by Mrs. Winder, plaintiff below. The sole question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. In --passing upon that question we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Jacobsen (C. C. A. 2) 157 F. 656, 657; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Tharp (C. C. A. 6) 223 F. 615, 616.
The facts are these: Joy owned and operated three cotton compresses in Oklahoma. One Litchfield was the manager and in charge of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. TharpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915