Legal Opinion

Joy v. Winder

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1935No. 1229Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Joy and Nelson have appealed from a judgment for personal injuries recovered against them by Mrs. Winder, plaintiff below. The sole question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. In --passing upon that question we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Jacobsen (C. C. A. 2) 157 F. 656, 657; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Tharp (C. C. A. 6) 223 F. 615, 616.

The facts are these: Joy owned and operated three cotton compresses in Oklahoma. One Litchfield was the manager and in charge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. TharpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API