Legal Opinion
David N Rentschler v. Township of Melrose
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 2017No. 336333PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
*114 Petitioner appeals the decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal (Tribunal) that he was not entitled to a principal residence exemption (PRE) under *115 MCL 211.7cc for the 2013, 2014, and 2015 tax years. Because the Tribunal made an error of law, we reverse.
I. FACTS AND TAX TRIBUNAL PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner is the owner of property located in Boyne City, Michigan (the property). Petitioner applied for a PRE on the property. On December 12, 2015, respondent issued a notice denying petitioner's PRE claim for the 2013, 2014, and 2015 tax years for two reasons. First, it stated that "[t]he property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnnie F Shinholster v. Annapolis HospMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Eugene Holmes, Margaret Holmes, as Voluntary Administrator for Eugene Holmes (Deceased), and Mark Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Eldenbrady v. City of AlbionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Marguerite Schubert v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Keith W Deforge v. Allouez TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022