Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kraetzer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 10, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Since it is firmly established in the law that a document purporting to exercise a power of appointment is to be read into and construed with the document granting the power (Matter of Terwilligar, 135 Misc. 170, 174; affd., 230 App. Div. 763; Matter of Davison, 137 Misc. 852, 858; affd., 236 App. Div. 684; Matter of Wickham, 139 Misc. 729, 731; Matter of Harbeck, 142 id. 57, 59), it follows that the devolution of the property in the inter vivos trust is determinable by a construction of that document into which must be read the pertinent testamentary directions of the donee of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Law of the Property of DavisonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re the Guardianship of RosenblumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of WickhamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. In re Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API