Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baba v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 13, 1969No. C.D. 3743Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING Opinion

Eosenstein, Judge:

I concur in overruling the protest on the basis of the record herein. Note is taken, however, of the decision in New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 199, C.D. 2533 (plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted, 54 Cust. Ct. 469, Abstract 69387), holding that plastic doilies or table scarfs imported from Israel were not classifiable, either directly or 'by similitude, under the provisions of paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the supplemental agreement between the United States and Switzerland, 90 Treas.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API