Legal Opinion

Douglas Elliman LLC v. 21-45 44th Drive LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

The provision of the agreement at issue states, “[A]dvances shall be fully reimbursed by [plaintiff] from the Commissions paid by [defendant] ... at a rate of twenty percent ... of [plaintiff]’s portion ... of each Commission . . . until [defendant] is fully reimbursed.” The motion court properly found that the requirement that defendants be “fully reimbursed” was qualified by the clause “from the Commissions ... at a rate of twenty percent ... of [plaintiff]’s portion of each Commission” (see Goldstein v Frances Emblems, Inc., 269 App Div 345, 347 [1st Dept 1945]). Although 20% of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Reiss v. Financial Performance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Goldstein v. Frances Emblems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API