Legal Opinion
Rose v. Rose
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1986No. 17484-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
483 So.2d 181 (1986)
Taeka T. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklyn D. ROSE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17484-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
January 22, 1986.
Levy & Shealy by S. Andrew Shealy, Ruston, for defendant-appellant.
Napper, Waltman, Madden & Rogers by R.H. Madden, III, Ruston, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JASPER E. JONES, SEXTON and LINDSAY, JJ.
LINDSAY, Judge.
Defendant, Franklyn D. Rose, appeals the trial court judgment recognizing the validity of a community property settlement agreement and the amendment thereto, entered into between the defendant and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rose v. Rose (In Re Rose)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Rose v. RoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Rose v. RoseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Tarver v. TarverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987