Legal Opinion · Dissent

M. W. Loveless, Dba Loveless Manufacturing Company, a Sole Proprietorship v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Company, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1955No. 5075Published

1DissentWallace, District Judge

Although the stipulation in Sec. 2(b) of the bill of lading does not specifically mention who shall file written notice of claim it is apparent such must be done by the claimant or “one acting in his behalf” ;1 and, to receive the writing in question as filed on the appellant’s behalf is absolute fiction. Understandably, the courts have been liberal in searching for “substantial compliance”. Nonetheless, the written notice, although permissibly informal in character, must be lodged by the holder of the claim. The instant written acknowledgment in no way pretended to be a filed claim. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hopper Paper Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Newtowne Mfg. Co. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Holland Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  4. Delphi Frosted Foods Corp. v. Illinois Cent. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. MacKieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API