Legal Opinion
United States v. Darwin Construction Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 1, 1988No. Civ. Y-86-67PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
On the date its payment was due on the civil contempt fine levied by this Court, respondent Darwin Construction Company filed a motion to set aside or reduce the fine pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). In the attached order, the Court extends the time for payment of the fine for an additional fourteen days and denies respondent’s motion. This memorandum * will resolve re spondent’s doubts that the Court carefully considered appropriate factors in determining that respondent was in contempt of the Court’s order to comply with the IRS summons for six days.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and H. E. Gilbert v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Dole Fresh Fruit Co. v. United Banana Co., Inc., Stanton Zebroski, Raymond Zebroski and Michael LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States and Special Agent Gail R. Kohorst of the Internal Revenue Service v. Darwin Construction Company, Inc. Lester J. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Acosta v. Emerald Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- David Birks et al. v. Small Community Specialists, L.L.C., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024