Childers v. Floyd
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARZILAY, Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Wyon Dale Childers (“Appellant”) appeals the United States District Court for the Northern *780District of Florida’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Appellant contends here, as he did unsuccessfully in the district court, that a Florida state trial court impermissibly constrained his right under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution to cross-examine the State’s star witness against him. For the reasons stated below, this court reverses the district court and instructs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011