Legal Opinion

Childers v. Floyd

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 2010No. 08-15590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARZILAY, Judge:

Petitioner-Appellant Wyon Dale Childers (“Appellant”) appeals the United States District Court for the Northern *780District of Florida’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Appellant contends here, as he did unsuccessfully in the district court, that a Florida state trial court impermissibly constrained his right under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution to cross-examine the State’s star witness against him. For the reasons stated below, this court reverses the district court and instructs…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Childers v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API