Holguin v. Villalobos
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
A majority of the court have concluded that we erred in affirming the trial court’s judgment in this case. It is apparent from the judgment that the trial judge thought that appellee was entitled to the injunctive relief he sought unless appellants were “operating their cars wholly within the city of El Paso and the suburbs thereof.” The judgment so recites. The only finding of the jury is to effect that appellants did not operate their motor propelled vehicles wholly within the limits of the city o'f El Paso and the suburbs thereof. Section 1(c) of Article 911a,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harding v. PearsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Gillis v. RosenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Barkley v. ConklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Plough, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Sneed v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.