Legal Opinion

Madisonville, H. & E. R. R. v. Cates

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 27, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

CASE 35 — ACTION BY J. W. CATES AGAINST THE MADISON-'VILLE, HARTFORD & EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Appeal from Hopkins Circuit Court. J. P. Gordon, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

Appellee recovered of appellant in the court below a verdict and judgment for &500 damages, resulting from the flooding of his land, and injury to. certain crops produced and growing thereon, caused, *259as alleged, by the •wrongful acts of appellant’s servants in negligently diverting the waters of a stream called “Greasy Creek,” and those of a tributary branch, from the natural beds or channels in which they were accustomed to stand and run, and causing them, in unusual volume and quantity, to overflow and stand upon appellee’s land and crops.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Bradshaw v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Stone v. AshurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Wharton v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Crane v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API