Legal Opinion

Barylski v. Paul

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1972No. Docket 11202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

In a non jury trial, plaintiff widow recovered judgment in this wrongful death action, MCLA 600.2922 et seq; MSA 27A.2922 et seq. Defendant appeals.

The issue presented by the appeal is, Is an insane person civilly responsible for his torts? Research fails to disclose any Michigan authority on this question.

About 8 a.m. July 22, 1968, Benjamin A. BarylsM went to defendant’s home to borrow a wrench. Defendant shot BarylsM, who died shortly thereafter. Soon after his arrest, defendant stated to a deputy sheriff “That he had shot the man”. Defendant also told the sheriff, “Somebody had been by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Roberts v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Kearbey Ex Rel. KearbeyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  2. Turner v. CaldwellConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
  3. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API