Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Byron Jackson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1937No. 8339PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, William Webster Wilson and J. D. Rush, were cited to show cause why they should not be adjudged guilty of contempt for a violation of an interlocutory injunction issued in a suit brought by Byron Jackson Company, a corporation, appellee, against William Webster Wilson to secure a permanent injunction against the infringement of appellee’s patents, and for an accounting.
The citation also directed the appellants to show cause “why the plaintiff should not have judgment against you for plaintiff’s costs and expenses in this proceeding, and for plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- In Re Merchants'stock and Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Raymor Ballroom Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- McCrone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. InfusinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.