Everett v. Croskrey
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Tama District Court— Hon John R. Caldwell,'Judge. This is an action for the partition of -certain real estate. There was a decree for the plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
I. The land involved in the suit is a tract of about sixty acres. It was formerly owned *334by Thomas Everett, who, by his last will and testament, devised it to his two daughters, Lavina Halstead and Caroline Croskrey, in equal shares. The plaintiff Sarah Everett purchased and now owns the undivided one half of said land which formerly belonged to Lavina Halstead. Caroline Croskrey continued to own the other undivided one half until her death, which occurred in May, 1884. She had no issue, and the defendant, Jacob Croskrey, is her surviving husband. A short time before her death, Caroline…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stivers v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Linton v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Shields v. KeysSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arnold v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Rench v. RenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Newberry v. NewberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Everett v. CroskreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Windsor v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.