Legal Opinion
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Gray-Bar Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation v. J. H. Copeland & Sons Construction, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants-Cross v. F & D Electrical Contractors, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1978No. 76-2053PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
568 F.2d 1159
24 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 82,181
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of
GRAY-BAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., a New York
Corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
J. H. COPELAND & SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC., a corporation, et
al., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellants,
v.
F & D ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Cross
Plaintiff Appellee.
No. 76-2053.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 3, 1978.
Wm. K. Zewadski, William C. Frye, Tampa, Fla., for Reliance.
R. Fred Lewis, Coconut Grove, Fla., for J. H. Copeland & Sons.
Frank Murray, Miami, Fla., for defendants-cross defendants-appellants.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Jacob Lichter and Jennie L. Lichter, Partners, Doing Business as Southern Fireproofing Company v. Mellon-Stuart CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S. Leo Harmonay, Inc. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- United States, for Use and Benefit of Pertun Construction Company v. Harvesters Group, Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981