Legal Opinion

Sparkman-Thompson, Inc. v. Chandler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

By original bill in equity, creditors of the estate of W. C. Pipkin, deceased, seek to reach in satisfaction of their debts the proceeds of life insurance effected by the deceased on his own life, and payable to his estate. TCxcept for this fund the estate is wholly insolvent, and the creditors are without other recourse.

The suit is resisted by Pearl H. Chandler, a niece of the deceased, as executrix of his will, and individually as legatee of the fund in dispute. The will prpvides:

“To my niece, Pearl H. Chandler, I give, devise and bequeath a policy of life insurance issued on my life by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cooper v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chrisman v. ChrismanTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Agee v. SaundersTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Dawson v. National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. KaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. American National Bank v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. AMERICAN NAT. B. & T. CO. OF CHATTANOOGA v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Crockett v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In re Estate of BruceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API