Legal Opinion

(HC) Roessler v. Covello

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 20, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02422Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL LEE ROESSLER, Case No. 2:19-cv-02422-KJM-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 14 PATRICK COVELLO, ECF No. 13 15 Respondent. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 16 DAYS 17 18 On March 20, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this case. ECF No. 13. After 19 petitioner failed to timely respond to the motion, the court directed him to file an opposition or 20 statement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API