Legal Opinion

Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, District Judge.

In this matter, the defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and/or on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. The basic fact situation involved is not in issue, but is sufficiently complex to require careful analysis.

On September 15, 1944, plaintiff’s predecessor filed its Corporation Income and Excess Profits Tax returns…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ambassador Hotel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Merrimac Hat Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Ambassador Hotel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Philadelphia Macaroni Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API