Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. North Tonawanda Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 2011Published

1Dissent

Centra, J.P. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the order granting the application to serve a late notice of claim. In deciding an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, Supreme Court is to consider the factors set forth in General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), but those factors are “nonexhaustive” and the decision whether to grant the application “compels consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances” (Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531, 539 [2006]). The “key factors for the court to consider . . . are whether the claimant has demonstrated a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Santana v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Mieux v. Alden High SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Friend v. Town of West SenecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Doe v. Goshen Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API