Legal Opinion

Austin v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 17, 1971No. 200-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

On December 2, 1966, claimant, Clinton G. *395Austin, an employee of Ralston Purina Co., suffered an injury to his back while lifting sacks of calcium phosphate. He submitted a claim to the Department of Labor and Industries, which was closed on September 29, 1967 with an award for permanent partial disability of 5 per cent of the maximum allowable for unspecified disability. The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals affirmed the department action. The board’s ruling was affirmed by a Spokane County jury. From this verdict, claimant appeals.

The only error assigned on appeal is the trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeKoning v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Sayler v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rambeau v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hutchings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zipp v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Zavala v. Twin City FoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Ana Zavala v. Twin City FoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Thomas A. Lunschen v. Department Of Labor & Industries Of The State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API