Legal Opinion

Casey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1930No. A-7325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McIntosh county of having possession of a still, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for period of 30 days.

The charging part of the information reads as follows :

a * -x- * pjiay Wiley Duke, Homer Duke and Wade Casey, did, in McIntosh county and state of Oklahoma on or about the ninth day of April, 1928, and anterior to the filing hereof, commit the crime of violating the prohibitory liquor laws of the state of Oklahoma in the manner and form as follows, to wit:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Batson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Likes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API