Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Hardin (In Re Hardin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 27, 1982No. 19-40732PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN FLOWERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Both of these cases concern the right of a Chapter 13 debtor to reinstate the installment payment provisions of an obligation which has been converted under state law into a lump sum demand obligation through acceleration. They have similar but not identical facts. For purposes of discussion the slight factual differences serve to define more clearly the parameters of the right to cure defaults. It is thus convenient that they be decided jointly pursuant to Rule 42, F.R.C.P. 1
In each case the debtor is the obligor on a note secured by a deed of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Companies Financial Corp. v. BrantleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1980
- Di Pierro v. Cullen (In Re Taddeo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Matter of LaPagliaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matter of SkellyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- In Re GwinnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Valente v. Savings Bank of RockvilleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- In Re FreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re SchnuppUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.