Legal Opinion

People v. Riley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1979No. Docket 77-1447PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled nolo contendere to the crime of attempted delivery of a controlled substance contrary to MCL 335.341; MSA 18.1070(41) and MCL 750.92; MSA 28.287. He was sentenced to a term of two to five years in prison and now appeals as of right.

The sole question on appeal is whether defendant’s nolo plea acted as a waiver of his right to challenge the legality of the search and seizure which produced the evidence against him. We hold that it does.

First, it should be noted that for purposes of the plea-waiver doctrine it is immaterial whether defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere. See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. HowardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. SundlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. LumsdenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. ReidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API