Cleary Bros. v. Port Reading R. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
There Were ten causes of action consolidated under the above title, each brought to recover damages from the respondent because of substantially the following alleged fault: “That the respondent, its agents and servants in charge of the respondent’s said steamtug, negligently and carelessly landed said coal barges alongside the said flotilla, and made or caused the said barges to be made fast to the said flotilla in a negligent, reckless, arid careless manner, and added the aforesaid lo'aded barges to the flotilla, which v. as -then *171made fast, causing too great a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- The Santa RitaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Kawasaki Zosensho of Kobe, Japan v. Cosulich Societa Triestina Di Navigazione of Trieste, ItalyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- Muller v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Francey v. . Rutland R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Falconer v. Martin O'MalleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024