Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Honsberger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 2012No. 5D11-4426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Edward and Terrence Brennan appeal the trial court’s order admitting a lost or destroyed will to probate. Because the appellee, Ruth Honsberger, failed to meet the statutory burden to prove the specific content of the will through the testimony of a disinterested witness, we reverse.

The facts in this case are largely undisputed and are set forth in Brennan v. Estate of Brennan, 40 So.3d 894, 895 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010):

On February 5, 2001, the decedent executed a will leaving his estate to his four children in unequal shares. Thereafter, on May 31, 2002, the decedent executed another will that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. Estate of BudahaziDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. In Re Estate of ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Brennan v. ESTATE OF BRENNANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kenneth Pilak, Russel Pilak and Deborah Ruthenburg v. Timothy G. Reigel and the Estate of Ronald G. SasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API