Legal Opinion

People v. Crayton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 23, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.

We affirm unanimously defendants’ conviction of violating subdivision 2 of section 722 of the Penal Law (disorderly conduct). A majority of the court agrees, too, that they were guilty of violating section 1851, which prohibits resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer in the discharge of his duty. Our view is that the statute should not be contracted *214to absolve the defendants of unlawful conduct merely because they engaged in what they conceived to be a form of protest.

Lawful protest is an aspect of freedom of speech, which Cabdozo called the matrix of nearly every other form of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. State v. AvnayimConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
  3. United States v. McDonaldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1879
  4. People v. KnightNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Decker v. CampusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. People v. De MartinoSuffolk County District Court · 1971
  4. People v. BeamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  5. People v. ScottJustice Court of the Village of Nyack · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API