People v. Crayton
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
We affirm unanimously defendants’ conviction of violating subdivision 2 of section 722 of the Penal Law (disorderly conduct). A majority of the court agrees, too, that they were guilty of violating section 1851, which prohibits resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer in the discharge of his duty. Our view is that the statute should not be contracted *214to absolve the defendants of unlawful conduct merely because they engaged in what they conceived to be a form of protest.
Lawful protest is an aspect of freedom of speech, which Cabdozo called the matrix of nearly every other form of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- State v. AvnayimConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- United States v. McDonaldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1879
- People v. KnightNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Decker v. CampusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- People v. De MartinoSuffolk County District Court · 1971
- People v. BeamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. ScottJustice Court of the Village of Nyack · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.