Holtzman v. Power
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyles J. Lane, J.
This proceeding is regarded in substance as an action for declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality (see 34 A D 2d 779).
Remand was ordered by the Appellate Division in order to add what it deemed ‘1 indispensable parties to the litigation ” as parties defendant. Presumably, pursuant to the order of the Appellate Division, petitioners have filed a copy of the notice of this remanded proceeding, together with postal return receipts indicating receipt of the notice by the affected parties. It is contended by the Attorney-General that the letter notice is legally insufficient and that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bernard Weisberg v. Paul Powell, Individually and as Secretary of State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Matter of BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Matter of Crane v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Callaghan v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harley McLain v. Ben Meier, Secretary of State and Allen Olson, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Gould v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Sangmeister v. WoodardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Sonneman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- New Alliance Party v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.